Register  |   Contact Us  |  Log in

Home » In the News » Social Media – Who’s Talking?

In the News

Social Media – Who’s Talking?

By Aaron Field

I was just shopping for a blu-ray player. Being conscientious and confused I devised a research plan (sound familiar to anyone?).

This is what the Internet taught me:

  • The information density of the DVD format was limited by the wavelength of the laser diodes used. (Wikipedia)
  • The LG BD670 is not the prettiest Blu-ray player on the block (PCMAG.COM)
  • “I bought the Sony BDP-S1 for the house for Christmas and we really got a lemmon (sic).” (Amazon.com user review)

:( as the kids would say. Utterly confused on what to buy.

Social media-based research feels eerily like my pathetic blu-ray research. A tremendous amount of information is Irrelevant, Opinionated by idiosyncratic “experts” and Unrepresentative of average consumers (with indifferent spelling).

Happily Social Media provides its own answer. Passionate communities are hubs for well-defined demographic segments (see http://babies.com/) and high-value customers (http://www.flyertalk.com/).

Essentially you know who is talking – a major advantage in the internet world. No wonder Insights teams increasingly find passionate communities reliable, truly expert, and representative of a specific consumer.  Whether you build these communities , find these communities on the internet, or create your own (see how Charles Schwab did it), they are a valuable asset alongside MROC’s.

And if you know anything about blu-ray players drop me a note. I am still searching.

Comments from the Network (1)

  1. Outliers & Observations » Walmart’s Social Shopping Agenda
    on September 12, 2011
    Respond

    [...] Social Media–Who’s Talking? [...]

Add Your Comment

Log in

Commenting Guidelines

We hope conversations will be energetic, constructive, and provocative. All posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.

We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

1. No selling of products or services.

2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.

More in In the News (27 of 73 articles)