This post was written by guest blogger Hans Eisenbeis, Iconoculture’s senior Financial Services editor
For a decade now — since the rise of the global economy — political pundits from Mumbai to Madrid, Hamburg to Honolulu have argued about “American exceptionalism”: the idea that the US is unique and can hold itself to different standards than all other nations. When it comes to love and war, you can argue both sides. But when it comes to the hard facts of economics, not so much. Last week Standard & Poor’s downgraded US creditworthiness from a top rating of AAA to a less-than-top AA+. That’s the first downgrade in America’s credit rating since credit rating began, early in the last century (WashingtonPost.com, 8 August 2011). It also puts the US behind many of its European allies, not to mention Canada. (Canada!)
What does it mean? First, we should recognize that credit-rating agencies themselves have been in hot water. There’s evidence that folks like Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and other credit raters contributed to the Great Recession (and the Not-So-Great Recovery) by rubber-stamping financial instruments and portraying risky investments (mortgage-backed securities, credit default swaps) as safe, easy money. The raters are in a fight for their lives, a fight that depends on reestablishing their credibility as objective, neutral evaluators of creditworthiness. And, as uncomfortable as it may be to admit, signs point to the fact that the US simply is not what it used to be in terms of macroeconomics. We’re $14 trillion in debt, and the people in charge of the federal checkbook can only agree on making a $2 trillion minimum payment. As NPR financial correspondent Heidi Moore succinctly commented, “The US government is like a kid who turns in his homework late and incomplete” (Minnesota Public Radio, 8 August 2011). Lucky the teacher didn’t flunk us.
It’s true that carrying the level of debt that we’ve been carrying is a financial disaster waiting to happen, but we’ve actually carried debt for 60 of the past 71 years. One might easily agree with vice president Dick Cheney, who, seven years ago, famously said, “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter.” And one might ask: Well, do they matter or not? If they do, then why has the US credit rating never before been downgraded? The answer, at least if you listen to S&P, is straightforward enough. The US government is not acting in a unified, responsible way. Simply put, it’s not acting like a triple-A credit risk, so it doesn’t deserve that rating. Time to play catch-up to the rest of the class: Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom all still enjoy AAA ratings. So much for American exceptionalism.
A double-dip recession is bound to have political repercussions stateside in the next 18 months. But for consumers in affected markets across the globe, rating-agency jockeying and stock market woes mostly translate to more of what they’ve already been living through for the past few years. While the Great Recession that started in 2007 forced a seismic shift in consumer attitudes — from a world of ample credit to one of credit scarcity, this economic news won’t immediately make consumers change their minds any more than they already have. Because while nations in North America and Europe are now coming to terms with getting their economic houses in order, regular consumers in homes across the globe have been doing that for some time.

Which generation has the most discretionary spending power, leads all generations in traditional media consumption and technology spending, stands at a population of roughly 76 million strong and will account for an unprecedentedly large community of people 65+ in 2050? That would be the Baby Boomers, a unique mix of Alpha Boomers to Zoomers aged 47-65 who are simultaneously the most influenced—and influential—generation in recent American history. Once dubbed “The Me Generation,” Boomers today have morphed into the “The Everybody Else” generation, raising young kids, funding college, nurturing grandkids, and helping aging parents. To keep it covered, Boomers are still “workin’ it” by scaling careers, planning semi-retirement, and launching small businesses of their own, coming into their second act with no intention of fading away. As lifelong doers, do-gooders, learners and buyers, they’re worth getting to know again as aging adults who will re-invent themselves and every category in the process.
Tragedies like the natural disaster in Japan often bring out the best in people. Occasionally, an event of this magnitude brings out the best in a brand as well. If a brand can use its reach, resources, and the captivity of its audience to help connect consumers to a cause that ignites their passions (or compassion) all involved can benefit: consumers, brands, and the cause at the center of the ecosystem.
Catchy title, huh? I must admit I stole it from two good friends, Jeff Yang and Kate Muhl, here at Iconoculture. They’re going to be diving into a handful of the cultural, political, and market differences between China and the U.S. in a few weeks at our Iconosphere 2011 event in Miami.
On the highways here in Delhi, the past and future share a lane. Creeping one way are shiny PR campaigns meant to thwart the raucous honking that accompanies any congregation of more than a couple of cars. Headed the other direction? The very audible, commonly agreed upon rules of the road, signified by armadas of old trucks, their tailgates painted with instructions begging for a sonic blast (“Honk please!”).
Our guest blog this week comes from an
Guest blogger